Polynomial Invariants

Jones, Alexander, and HOMFLY-PT polynomials - the computational crown jewels

Polynomial Invariants: The Crown Jewels of Knot Theory

In 1984, Vaughan Jones discovered a revolutionary polynomial invariant that transformed knot theory and earned him the Fields Medal. The Jones polynomial can distinguish knots that previous invariants could not, opening new connections to physics, algebra, and quantum computing.

In this module, you'll explore the Jones polynomial and the classical Alexander polynomial, compare their strengths and weaknesses, and see how polynomial invariants succeed where simpler invariants fail. These tools are the most powerful instruments we have for distinguishing and classifying knots.

What You'll Learn

🏆
Jones Polynomial
The revolutionary invariant that earned a Fields Medal
📜
Alexander Polynomial
The classical polynomial from 1928
⚖️
Polynomial Comparison
Compare Jones, Alexander, and HOMFLY polynomials
Power of Polynomials
See where polynomials succeed and simpler invariants fail

Jones Polynomial Calculator

The Jones polynomial V(t) is a revolutionary knot invariant discovered by Vaughan Jones in 1984. It's a Laurent polynomial that can distinguish many knots that other invariants cannot!

Jones Polynomial
V(t) = t + t³ - t⁴
Trefoil (3₁)
The trefoil has a non-trivial Jones polynomial, proving it is knotted!

Knot Properties

ChiralTorus knot

Polynomial Evaluation

When t = 1
V(1) = 1
When t = -1
V(-1) = -1
KnotJones Polynomial V(t)V(1)
Unknot (0₁)11
Trefoil (3₁)t + t³ - t⁴1
Trefoil (Mirror) (3₁*)t⁻¹ + t⁻³ - t⁻⁴1
Figure-Eight (4₁)-t² + 1 - t⁻² + t⁻³ - t⁻⁴0
Cinquefoil (5₁)t² + t⁴ + t⁶ - t⁷ - t⁸1
Three-Twist (5₂)t + t³ + t⁵ - t⁶2

🪞 Chirality Detection

If a knot K has Jones polynomial VK(t), then its mirror image K* has polynomial VK*(t) = VK(t⁻¹).

3₁
Right Trefoil
t + t³ - t⁴
3₁*
Left Trefoil
t⁻¹ + t⁻³ - t⁻⁴

The Jones Revolution

Vaughan Jones discovered this polynomial in 1984 while studying von Neumann algebras. It revolutionized knot theory and earned him the Fields Medal in 1990!

Key properties:

  • V(unknot) = 1
  • V(K*)(t) = V(K)(t⁻¹) where K* is the mirror image
  • Can distinguish many knots that crossing number and signature cannot
  • Related to statistical mechanics and quantum field theory through the Yang-Baxter equation

Alexander Polynomial Calculator

The Alexander polynomial Δ(t) is the classical polynomial invariant, discovered by J.W. Alexander in 1928. While less powerful than the Jones polynomial, it's easier to compute and has beautiful algebraic properties.

Alexander Polynomial
Δ(t) = t - 1 + t⁻¹
Trefoil (3₁)
The trefoil has a symmetric Alexander polynomial.

Knot Determinant

The determinant of a knot is |Δ(-1)|, the absolute value of the Alexander polynomial evaluated at t = -1.

Determinant of Trefoil
3

📜 Historical Note

One of the first non-trivial knots analyzed by Alexander in 1928.

KnotAlexander Polynomial Δ(t)Det
Unknot (0₁)11
Trefoil (3₁)t - 1 + t⁻¹3
Figure-Eight (4₁)-1 + 3t - t²5
Cinquefoil (5₁)t² - t + 1 - t⁻¹ + t⁻²5
Three-Twist (5₂)2t - 3 + 2t⁻¹7
Stevedore (6₁)2t - 3 + 2t⁻¹7

⚠️ Limitation: Same Polynomial, Different Knots

The Alexander polynomial cannot distinguish all knots. For example, 5₂ and 6₁ have the same polynomial:

5₂
Three-Twist
2t - 3 + 2t⁻¹
=
6₁
Stevedore
2t - 3 + 2t⁻¹

This is where the Jones polynomial excels - it CAN distinguish these knots!

About the Alexander Polynomial

The Alexander polynomial was the first polynomial invariant discovered. It comes from the homology of the infinite cyclic cover of the knot complement.

Key properties:

  • Δ(unknot) = 1
  • Δ(t) = Δ(t⁻¹) - always symmetric
  • Δ(-1) is always odd (the determinant property)
  • Cannot detect chirality (unlike Jones polynomial)
  • Easier to compute than Jones polynomial using Seifert matrices

Polynomial Invariants Comparison

Different polynomial invariants have different strengths. Compare the Jones, Alexander, and HOMFLY polynomials side-by-side to see which ones can distinguish different knots.

Trefoil
Notation: 3₁
Jones Polynomial
V(t)
t + t³ - t⁴
✓ Distinguishes
Alexander Polynomial
Δ(t)
t - 1 + t⁻¹
✓ Distinguishes
HOMFLY Polynomial
P(a,z)
a² + a²z²
✓ Distinguishes

💡 Interesting Fact

First non-trivial knot - distinguished by all polynomials.

KnotJones V(t)Alexander Δ(t)HOMFLY P(a,z)
0₁111
3₁t + t³ - t⁴t - 1 + t⁻¹a² + a²z²
4₁-t² + 1 - t⁻² + t⁻³ - t⁻⁴-1 + 3t - t²a² - 2 + a⁻²
5₂t + t³ + t⁵ - t⁶2t - 3 + 2t⁻¹a⁴ + 2a²z²
6₁2t - t² - t⁻¹ + t⁻² - t⁻³2t - 3 + 2t⁻¹a⁴ - 2a² + 2
5₁t² + t⁴ + t⁶ - t⁷ - t⁸t² - t + 1 - t⁻¹ + t⁻²a⁴ + a⁴z⁴

⚠️ Same Alexander, Different Jones

Knots 5₂ and 6₁ have the same Alexander polynomial but different Jones polynomials:

5₂: Δ(t) = 2t - 3 + 2t⁻¹
6₁: Δ(t) = 2t - 3 + 2t⁻¹

Jones polynomial can distinguish them!

🎯 HOMFLY Generalizes Both

The HOMFLY polynomial is a 2-variable generalization that contains both Jones and Alexander:

  • Set a = t, z = t - t⁻¹ → Jones polynomial
  • Set a = 1 → Alexander polynomial

It's the most powerful of the three!

Polynomial Invariants Hierarchy

Different polynomial invariants have different discriminating power:

Alexander (1928): First polynomial invariant, but cannot detect chirality and sometimes fails to distinguish different knots.
Jones (1984): Revolutionary invariant that can detect chirality and distinguish many knots Alexander cannot. Earned Fields Medal!
HOMFLY (1985): Two-variable generalization that includes both Jones and Alexander as special cases. Most powerful!

The Power of Polynomial Invariants

Polynomial invariants are more powerful than simple numeric invariants. This demo shows examples where polynomial invariants succeed in distinguishing knots where simpler invariants fail.

5₂
Three-Twist
vs
6₁
Stevedore

Crossing Number

Distinguishes
5₂: 5
=
6₁: 6

Signature

Distinguishes
5₂: σ = 2
=
6₁: σ = 0

Tricolorability

Fails
5₂: No
=
6₁: No

Alexander Polynomial

Fails
5₂: Δ(t) = 2t - 3 + 2t⁻¹
6₁: Δ(t) = 2t - 3 + 2t⁻¹

Jones Polynomial

Distinguishes
5₂: V(t) = t + t³ + t⁵ - t⁶
6₁: V(t) = 2t - t² - t⁻¹ + t⁻² - t⁻³

📊 Conclusion

Crossing number and signature distinguish these, but Alexander polynomial fails. Jones succeeds!

Simple Invariants
2/3
distinguish
Alexander Polynomial
Fails
Jones Polynomial
Succeeds

Why Polynomial Invariants Matter

This demo shows the progressive power of knot invariants:

  • Simple numeric invariants (crossing number, signature) are easy to compute but limited
  • Alexander polynomial (1928) was revolutionary but cannot detect chirality
  • Jones polynomial (1984) can distinguish many knots Alexander cannot, including mirror images
  • No single invariant is perfect - we use multiple invariants together to classify knots!

📚 Historical Timeline

1928
Alexander Polynomial

J.W. Alexander introduces the first polynomial invariant, derived from the homology of cyclic covers. Revolutionary for its time but cannot detect chirality.

1984
Jones Polynomial 🏆

Vaughan Jones discovers the Jones polynomial while studying von Neumann algebras and operator theory. It can detect chirality and distinguish knots the Alexander polynomial cannot. This breakthrough earned Jones the Fields Medal in 1990.

1985
HOMFLY Polynomial

Six mathematicians (Hoste, Ocneanu, Millett, Freyd, Lickorish, Yetter) independently discover a 2-variable generalization that contains both Jones and Alexander as special cases. The most powerful of the classical polynomials!

1988-Present
Modern Era

Khovanov homology and other categorifications provide even deeper invariants. Connections to quantum field theory, topological quantum computing, and string theory continue to emerge.

🔑 Key Concepts

Jones Polynomial V(t)
A Laurent polynomial in variable t that can detect chirality. For a knot K, its mirror image K* has VK*(t) = VK(t⁻¹). The unknot has V(t) = 1. Computed using skein relations or the Kauffman bracket.
Alexander Polynomial Δ(t)
The classical polynomial invariant, always symmetric: Δ(t) = Δ(t⁻¹). Cannot detect chirality but easier to compute than Jones. Derived from the Seifert matrix or homology of cyclic covers.
HOMFLY Polynomial P(a,z)
A 2-variable polynomial that generalizes both Jones and Alexander. Setting a = t and z = t - t⁻¹ gives the Jones polynomial. Setting a = 1 gives the Alexander polynomial. The most discriminating of the classical polynomials!
Skein Relations
Recursive formulas that relate the polynomial of a knot to simpler knots obtained by changing or smoothing crossings. These provide algorithmic methods for computing polynomial invariants.

🌐 Connections to Other Fields

Statistical Mechanics

The Jones polynomial emerges from the Yang-Baxter equation in statistical mechanics. Knot diagrams correspond to partition functions of 2D lattice models!

Quantum Field Theory

Edward Witten showed the Jones polynomial arises from Chern-Simons theory, a topological quantum field theory. This earned him a Fields Medal in 1990!

Quantum Computing

The Jones polynomial is connected to topological quantum computing via anyons and braid groups. Computing it efficiently is BQP-complete!

DNA Biology

DNA strands can form knots! Polynomial invariants help biologists understand DNA recombination and the action of topoisomerase enzymes.

🎓 What We've Learned

1. Jones Polynomial: We explored the revolutionary Jones polynomial V(t), which can detect chirality and distinguish many knots. The right-handed trefoil has V(t) = t + t³ - t⁴, while its mirror has V(t) = t⁻¹ + t⁻³ - t⁻⁴. This discovery earned Vaughan Jones the Fields Medal!

2. Alexander Polynomial: We studied the classical Alexander polynomial Δ(t), which is always symmetric but easier to compute. While it cannot detect chirality, it remains a valuable tool. Notably, knots 5₂ and 6₁ have the same Alexander polynomial but different Jones polynomials!

3. Polynomial Comparison: We compared Jones, Alexander, and HOMFLY polynomials side-by-side. HOMFLY is a 2-variable generalization that contains both Jones and Alexander as special cases, making it the most powerful classical polynomial invariant.

4. The Power of Polynomials: We saw concrete examples where polynomial invariants succeed in distinguishing knots that simpler invariants (crossing number, signature, tricolorability) cannot. This demonstrates why polynomial invariants are essential tools in modern knot theory.

Next Up: Now that you understand polynomial invariants, you're ready to explore the fundamental group - an algebraic invariant that captures even deeper topological information! The fundamental group connects knot theory to the Group Theory module you may have already studied.